Cell Tower Regulations Frustrate Homeowners

Cell towers hidden in church steeples

Homeowners say the rule undermines their ability to weigh in oninstallations in the community. Though the antennas are an eyesore, Guglietti’s primary concern is possible health effects. Experts disagree on the impact caused by cell towers. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, which are emitted by wireless phones and cell towers, as a possible human carcinogen. Health Canada states that radiofrequency fields given off by cellphone towers are safe as long as the facility adheres to federal regulatory requirements limiting human exposure. In an email to CBC News,a Bellspokesperson wrote thatall its sites, including the Oakville, Ont., one near Guglietti’s house, “meet or exceed allfederal safetyand other operatingrequirements.” City councillor struggles with issue In June, construction began on a 14.9-metre cellphone tower in a Barrie, Ont.neighbourhood that triggered a backlash over potential health concerns for those living across the street and students walking to nearby schools. “Telecommunications companies are able to come in and put these things basically wherever they want: as close to any residents, as close to any schools, and as close to any community centre they want,” Barrie, Ont. city councillor John Brassard told CBC News. “Why not make it 14.99 metres?” he asked. Since the incident, the Barrie city councillor hasbegun working to change federal regulations to give Canadians a voiceover the placement of cell towers in their neighbourhoods. “Authority and a large part of that decision making should be made by the municipality and in consultation with Industry Canada.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/cell-tower-regulations-frustrate-homeowners-1.1278812


The hope is to “get the best deal for citizens.” In this cell phone-saturated region, cell towers — poles and steel lattices stretching more than a hundred feet into the air, occasionally disguised as Georgia pines — have become a taxpayer issue. Across the country, monthly payments to property owners can range from each tower can fall between $750 to $4,000 per month, said Andrew Schrage, a former hedge fund portfolio analyst focusing on the telecom industry. Many property owners “really don’t understand the value of the site,” said Hugh Odom, a real estate and telecom attorney who represented AT&T for more than 1o years and now negotiates with telecoms on behalf of landowners. “These leases people hold are some of the least optimized assets they have.” Property owners routinely make the mistake of treating cell tower leases like typical real estate transactions, said Odom, president of Nashville-based Vertical Consultants. As a result, perhaps 90 percent of the owners are underpaid, he said. In Atlanta , Mayor Kasim Reed’s administration recently mulled ways to wring more money from the city’s cell towers through more favorable contracts with the telecommunications companies that use them to blast signals throughout the city. A number of leases are set to expire by the end of next year. Atlanta faces a $20 million cut in its budget next fiscal year. It reaps just over $1 million a year in rent from 41 leases spread across 21 towers and structures.Most of the leases run for 20 years.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.ajc.com/news/news/local/cities-bet-on-cell-towers-as-revenue-source/nQTPd/

Cities bet on cell towers as revenue source

Since then, the council has approved towers in Prairie Knoll Park, Hidden Creek and Shadowbrook and by the Andover Station North Ball Fields, which is technically not a city park, according to Gamache. None of these towers were built. T-Mobile in 2009 had proposed a cell tower at Prairie Knoll Park. Clearwire Wireless in 2010 had wanted new towers to provide 4G Internet service at the three other locations. City Administrator Jim Dickinson said there are no new applications for cell towers or wireless Internet towers in any city park. Staff is not currently working on this, but if an application does come in for a tower in a park in the near future, the discussion will certainly be front and center again, Dickinson said. Gamache said these towers, which can reach up to 120 feet tall in residential districts, are not a good fit for parks. He would prefer to only see them in commercial or industrial areas. The 2008 ordinance allows towers to be up to 150 feet in those districts. What Id like to do is to say we really dont need that little bit of money we would have gotten from the cell towers and let us stop putting them in our parks, Gamache said. I look at the nice parks we have in our city and it just doesnt fit.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://abcnewspapers.com/2013/11/30/andover-approves-cell-phone-antennas-two-towers/

Andover approves cell phone antennas on two towers

The Andover City Council approved two conditional use permits for Verizon Wireless to have cell phone antennas on water towers by Andover City Hall and in Rose Park. Verizon will be constructing a 308 square-foot accessory structure to store its equipment next to the Rose Park water tower. Photo by Eric Hagen

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration as well as phone companies state that cell towers do not pose a health risk to those living around them. Cell phones and their accompanying towers have not been around long enough to judge what long term effects they will have on the human body over time. Martin Cooper invented the first cell phone in 1973. It weighed two pounds and since there was such an expense they were only used by the military and some businesses. In the 1980s they became smaller and less expensive, but they didn`t really become mainstream until much later. It was about 2002 for the US that over 50% of the population were cell phone subscribers. Today that number is up to 91%. In 2009, more than half the world`s population, an estimated 4.1 billion people, owned a mobile phone, according to the United Nations. Researchers have tried to create comparisons so an educated guess can be made as to whether there is a risk in living near a cell tower. A 2006 report from the World Health Organization noted that after some fifty years of human exposure to Radio Frequency signals from FM radio and television, which are similar to cell phone towers, there are no known negative effects on health.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.naturalnews.com/032539_cell_towers_church_steeples.html

Tower Dumps in SC Could Give Your Cell Data to Police

The Richland County Sheriff’s Department used a tower dump during the investigation into a string of car breakins, where weapons and computers were stolen. They combined the Tower Dump information with DNA evidence and in 2011 arrested Phillip Tate on three counts of “breaking and entering a motor vehicle” and one count of “larceny.” “He did break and enter into both of those vehicles, one of them being the vehicle of http://towerleases.com/cell-tower-lease-agreement/ Sheriff Lott. It was parked at his house,” said Fifth Circuit Solicitor Joanna McDuffy in court. “It was his sheriff department issued vehicle. Weapons were taken from that vehicle your honor.” Search warrants we found say Richland Sheriff’s investigators requested dumps on two cell phone towers during their investigation. The dump gave investigators information on every cell phone connected to those towers during the requested time, even if they were not related to the crime. “So for example if you have a smart phone and you’re checking your email, that would cause some communication between your cell phone and one or more cell towers,” said Christopher Sogohian, a principal technologist for the ACLU. He says a connection would also be made if you’re texting, tweeting, on Facebook, on SnapChat, or just making a regular phone call. “The police can then go back to the phone company and ask for identifying information,” Sogohian said. As long as police have a search warrant or court order, cell phone companies will provide the information. “In recognizing that it’s not just the CIA or FBI tracking a terrorist that may have flown over here, this is local law enforcement. As citizens, we sort of have a question: how often is this happening?” said Keith Pounds, president of counterrorism consulting firm Countercon. Richland Sheriff’s investigators used Tower Dumps after the 2005 murder of Gadsden store owner Freddie Hill. Tommy Taylor was arrested and convicted of murder for shooting Hill as he was opening his store. “We want them to catch the bad guy,” Pounds said. He supports Tower Dumps, but only if a search warrant is signed, the data is purged after an investigation is complete and law enforcement notify subscribers included in the database. “Inform us,” Pounds said. “Or at least those couple of hundred or couple of thousand people, innocent people, inform them that hey we acquired your information for this particular crime. We’re going to purge the data and get rid of it.” In 2011 across the country, two top providers AT&T and Verizon filled more than half a million requests for your data through court ordered dumps and other emergency requests. “Am I surprised this is happening?Certainly,” said Jay Bender, a First Amendment attorney who represents WLTX. “To turn everybody’s telephone data to the police unrelated to any suspicion of crime, I think it’s an unreasonable search and seizure. I don’t think that’s permitted by the Constitution.” When your cell information ends up in a police database, it could stay there a long time. South Carolina evidence control laws say if a suspect is convicted or pleads guilty, police could keep everything they get from a Tower Dump for up to seven years. “What we recognize is that could not just be hundreds, but thousands of people,” Pounds said. Law enforcement don’t have to tell you if they’ve got what was on your phone. Currently, there’s little legal guidance on how Tower Dumps should be used and what rules law enforcement should follow. We found a total of five search warrants for cell data that were part of the investigation that led police to goods stolen by Phillip Tate. “There’s so much information we can gather, most of us don’t know it’s already happening,” Pounds said.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.wltx.com/news/onyourside/article/257093/325/Tower-Dumps-in-SC-Could-Give-Your-Cell-Data-to-Police-


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s